AI Templates

Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.0 Fast

Seedance 2.0 from ByteDance and Seedance 2.0 Fast from ByteDance, compared on what you can feed them, what they output and what they cost here.

Updated October 30, 2026

The short answer

  • Seedance 2.0 Fast has the lower starting price: 4 credits/s (480p, 4s) against 5 credits/s (480p, 4s) for Seedance 2.0. At the same resolution the gap can be smaller; see the table below.
  • Seedance 2.0 goes up to 1080p; Seedance 2.0 Fast tops out at 720p.

Specs side by side

Seedance 2.0Seedance 2.0 Fast
DeveloperByteDanceByteDance
Inputstext to video, first and last frame, up to 9 reference imagestext to video, first and last frame, up to 9 reference images
Reference uploads9 images, 3 videos, 3 audio clips9 images, 3 videos, 3 audio clips
Resolutions480p, 720p, 1080p480p, 720p
Length4–15 seconds4–15 seconds
Aspect ratiosauto, 21:9, 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16auto, 21:9, 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16
Audiooptionaloptional
Lowest price5 credits/s (480p, 4s)4 credits/s (480p, 4s)

Price for a short clip

Seedance 2.0: 25 credits for 5 seconds at 480p. Seedance 2.0 Fast: 20 credits for 5 seconds at 480p. Every price for every length and resolution is on each model's page; plans and credit packs are on Pricing.

Credits per second at each resolution

ResolutionSeedance 2.0Seedance 2.0 Fast
480p5 credits/s4 credits/s
720p10 credits/s8 credits/s
1080p26 credits/snot offered

At the shortest length. Models that bill per video work out cheaper per second on longer clips.

Which should you choose?

Choose Seedance 2.0 if

  • you need 1080p output
Try Seedance 2.0

Choose Seedance 2.0 Fast if

  • you want the lower price per second
Try Seedance 2.0 Fast

Run Seedance 2.0 and Seedance 2.0 Fast on the same prompt

One prompt, the same images, video and audio, up to 4 models at once. Each model is charged its own credits; failed videos are refunded.

0/5000
Aspect ratio
Target length 5seach model uses its nearest length

Models to compare (2/4)

5s150 cr
5s90 cr
5s50 cr
5s50 cr
5s40 cr
No text to video
4s30 cr
4s30 cr
5s50 cr
No text to video
5s15 cr
5s25 cr
5s20 cr
5s15 cr
5s75 cr
5s150 cr
4s40 cr
4s160 cr
4s11 cr
5s50 cr
5s35 cr
5s60 cr
6s10 cr
5s50 cr
5s50 cr
5s100 cr
No text to video
5s24 cr
Total 45 credits for 2 videos

FAQ

Is Seedance 2.0 or Seedance 2.0 Fast better?

It depends on the shot. Seedance 2.0 Fast has the lower starting price: 4 credits/s (480p, 4s) against 5 credits/s (480p, 4s) for Seedance 2.0. At the same resolution the gap can be smaller; see the table below. Seedance 2.0 goes up to 1080p; Seedance 2.0 Fast tops out at 720p. The fastest way to decide is to run your own prompt on both: the comparison tool sends the same prompt and references to each model at once.

Which is cheaper, Seedance 2.0 or Seedance 2.0 Fast?

A 5-second 480p Seedance 2.0 video costs 25 credits; a 5-second 480p Seedance 2.0 Fast video costs 20 credits. Higher resolutions and longer clips cost more, and failed videos are refunded.

Can I use the same reference images with Seedance 2.0 and Seedance 2.0 Fast?

Seedance 2.0: 9 images, 3 videos, 3 audio clips. Seedance 2.0 Fast: 9 images, 3 videos, 3 audio clips. On the comparison page, inputs a model can't take grey it out instead of sending a job that would fail.

Do Seedance 2.0 and Seedance 2.0 Fast generate sound?

Seedance 2.0: optional. Seedance 2.0 Fast: optional.

Which is better for vertical TikTok or Reels videos?

Both can make vertical video when 9:16 is in their aspect ratios. Seedance 2.0: auto, 21:9, 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16. Seedance 2.0 Fast: auto, 21:9, 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16. "Set by the model" means it frames the video from your input image.

Can I try Seedance 2.0 and Seedance 2.0 Fast on the same prompt here?

Yes. The comparison tool on this page has both models selected: write a prompt, add the same images or reference video if you like, and press Generate. Each model is charged its own credits, and you can add up to two more models.

Sources

Specs and prices come from the models as offered in our generator (updated October 30, 2026). Makers' pages: ByteDance.

More comparisons